Why do I ask? One side effect of the new teacher training courses (DTLLS and GDTLLS) especially in year 2, is that lecturers are encouraged to explore, examine and criticise the business functions of their institution. As such, management suddenly come under scrutiny from their subordinates to a degree previously un-encountered. Gone are the days of generic moaning about policy and management demands - this has now been replaced by serious study, research and analysis - level 5 and Level 6 analysis at that. All in all, the new graduates, when they moan, will be doing it with new authority. Managers and policies are being appraised by their subordinates as never before.
What then are these lecturers finding in their research? What recommendations are coming out of their analysis?
At this point I can only comment on my own findings (though feel free to leave comments). Early findings indicate the following:
- Short Term and Medium Term business goals are in conflict.
- Lack of synergy between important areas of business function.
- Marketing can and should be more closely aligned to business objectives.
- Pressure to pass sub-standard student work to meet targets diminishes staff morale and respect for management.
I suggest that the degree to which these two questions can be answered in the affirmative is a primary indicator of the degree to which managers understand that F.E. is a business, and treat it as such.
One very heartening thing I can say in favour of our new management... we have been invited to give feedback, we have been asked to tell them the things they may not want to hear. This is very refreshing. However, I wonder how many will dare to do it? It very much depends on whether the aim of management is to root out and squash the criticisms, or whether they are truly open to new ideas, and willing to hear them out non-judgementally.
Posts
